continuity-under-the-integral-sign-image

Continuity under the integral sign

We consider here a measure space (Ω,A,μ) and TR a topological subspace. For a map f:T×ΩR such that for all tT the map f(t,):ΩRωf(t,ω) is integrable, one can define the function F:TRtΩf(t,ω) dμ(ω)

Following theorem is well known (and can be proven using dominated convergence theorem):

THEOREM for an adherent point xT, if

  • ωΩlimtxf(t,ω)=φ(ω)
  • There exists a map g:ΩR such that tT,ωΩ, |f(t,ω)|g(ω)

then φ is integrable and limtxF(t)=Ωφ(ω) dμ(ω)
In other words, one can switch lim and signs.

We provide here a counterexample showing that the conclusion of the theorem might not hold if f is not bounded by a function g as supposed in the premises of the theorem.

Let’s consider f:[0,)×[0,)R(t,ω)tetω For all t[0,), the map ωf(t,ω) is integrable on [0,). Therefore, one can define F:[0,)Rt0tetω dω

Moreover for all ω[0,), f(0,ω)=0 hence F(0)=0. And for t0, F(t)=0tetω dω=1.

Finally limt00tetω dω=10=0limt0(tetω) dω

One can verify that for ω(0,), the maximum of ttetω is obtained for t=1ω and is equal to 1eω. Hence a map g as defined in the hypotheses of the theorem is forced to satisfy the inequality 1eωg(ω) and cannot be integrable.

Leave a Reply